Description

DESCRIPTION

London and South Western Railway

South Eastern Railway

London Chatham and Dover Railway

London, Brighton and South Coast Railway

Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway

Metropolitan Railway

Metropolitan District Railway

Ernest Leopold Ahrons (1866 – 1926),  was educated at the Bradford Grammar School and Yorkshire College, Leeds. As a student at the latter he obtained one out of three advanced scholarships in mathematics and physics, and was awarded first prize in engineering construction and mechanism and machinery. Leaving college in 1885, Ahrons went as a pupil under Mr. W. Dean to Swindon Locomotive Works, Great Western Railway, until 1888, and for two years after was employed in the Drawing Office and as an inspector of materials. In 1890 he became Chief Draughtsman to Messrs. Fleming, Macfarlane & Co., of Middleton, and soon afterwards obtained a position on the drawing office staff of Messrs. Beyer, Peacock & Co. Ltd. He was appointed in 1892 to the position of Engineer and Manager of the Government Workshops attached to the Ecole Khédivial d’Arts et Métiers, at Boulac, Cairo. Owing to ill health, he resigned this appointment in 1898, and returned to England. In the same year he became engineer-in-charge of the general department of Messrs. Henry Simon Ltd., of Manchester. Between the years 1902 and 1917 he held various positions in engineering industry, and during the Great War acted as a Trade Officer at the Department of Overseas Trade (Development and Intelligence). He resigned from the Government service in 1919, and until his death devoted himself entirely to literary work.

According to Hamilton Ellis,  LOCOMOTIVE & TRAIN WORKING…” is by far the best body of published work describing what rail travel was like in the second half of Victoria´s Reign”. Ahrons did time trains as a passenger, but unlike C .J. Allen, O. S. Nock and later, P. W. B. Semmens, did not pad out his work with practically signal box by signal box passing times, confining himself basically to departure and arrival times, commenting  “late”, “on time” or “early”. The type of detailed log described is virtually meaningless without details of weather throughout the journey, was the train half full, full “full and standing?”; what recovery time was privately allowed in the Working Timetable?; what did the guard´s journal for the run have to report over delays caused by large numbers of passengers leaving or joining, GPO loading or unloading mail, or the railway’s own parcel and luggage traffic? Also unlike the “professional” train timers, Ahrons did not feel the need to avoid criticism of the railway, for fear of not being granted footplate trips and free passes. He was a keen observer, not just of locomotives but also of passenger carriages and of stations. His style, although not quite as entertaining as Hamilton Ellis, nonetheless is readable, and betrays a dry sense of humour.  The South Eastern and the London Chatham and Dover, who he regarded as delinquent railways (along with the contemporary L&Y, Highland and Great North of Scotland) detail the sufferings inflicted on their passengers (apart from Boat Train customers) by their game of “beggar my neighbour”. However, the Brighton, with its excessively high fares, and so called “Expresses” does not escape criticism. Ahrons noted a newspaper correspondent who reported that a dead mackerel on the LNWR Fleetwood – London fish train, travelled at a faster start to top timimg than a first class passenger on the best that the LBSCR, could offer! .